With the 2013 season quickly approaching, one aspect to watch out of the Pacific Northwest will be how the Ducks make use of stud playmaker De'Anthony Thomas. As Marcus Mariota and Thomas develop, at quarterback and receiver, respectively, growing Thomas' role in the pass game should be the next phase of revving up the offensive production.
In 2012, Oregon's offense was among the nation's best, finishing third in rushing, fifth in total offense and second in scoring. Chip Kelly's system was potent, and getting to 12-1 on the year, the Ducks reaped the benefits of the uptempo, ground-based attack.
Entering 2013, with first-year head coach Mark Helfrich captaining the attack, Oregon looks to maintain its place atop college football's offensive pedestal. Running back Byron Marshall and newcomer Thomas Tyner will look to pick up where Kenjon Barner and his 1,767 rushing yards and 21 rushing touchdowns left off a season ago.
A season ago, De'Anthony Thomas was a Heisman hopeful for the Ducks, a kid that the nation expected to be in New York City come December thanks to his electric playmaking ability. However, what transpired was a steep drop-off in production following the Ducks' first three non-conference games. Thomas only topped 100 offensive yards three times in Pac-12 play, even as the rest of the Oregon offense posted huge numbers.
Theoretically, Thomas should make up the difference on special teams through punt and kickoff returns, but teams have taken the ball out of his hands in that respect. Thomas only had 20 returns during the Pac-12 season, six punts and 14 kickoffs. Teams are punting the ball away, forcing fair catches and kicking touchbacks to neutralize Thomas.
If the 5'9" speedster is going to play a bigger role for the Oregon attack, it is going to have to come through the air.
Thomas is a "spiky" runner, in that he gains little, gains little, gains little and then explodes for a big run when teams make mistakes. He is not built to be the every-down back like current guys Marshall and Tyner, or the past backs LaMichael James and Kenjon Barner.
As a known commodity, teams are looking for Thomas when he steps on the field, especially when DAT gets close to the backfield. If he lines up in the backfield, teams notice. When he motions into the backfield, teams notice. The kid is a lightning rod for defenders, and not giving up the explosive play to Thomas is written on the defensive game plan in Magic Marker.
The area for DAT to make his hay will be in the passing game. Last year, Thomas set the pace for the Ducks with 45 catches, but only posted 445 yards to go with those catches. Josh Huff's 493 yards were tops for the receiving corp, as first-year quarterback Mariota worked to find his way through the air for 2,677 passing yards. This year Huff, fellow receiver Bralon Addison and tight end Colt Lyerla should expect bigger things out of Mariota through the air.
To go along with Mariota's development, it will be curious to see how De'Anthony Thomas gets used by the Ducks. There are serious areas of opportunity for the hybrid receiver-running back, it is all about Helfrich getting him the ball in space.
Last season the bulk of Thomas' receptions came on the edge. He ran smoke routes, screens, speed outs and a few deep outs and wheel routes. Plays that stretched the defense horizontally and gave Mariota throws that would either end up in Thomas' hands or out of bounds. Overall, much of Oregon's passing was focused to the edges of defenses.
In the run game, Oregon focuses so much on taxing teams both inside and outside. The Ducks use the mid-line read to put pressure on defensive tackles or penetrating linebackers. They use the inside zone-read to get between the tackles and the outside zone-read to push towards the edges. They use the triple option to attack inside, wide and outside all in the same play. They also run power, counter, trap and sweep, with reads by the quarterback, to put pressure on the interior and edge of a defense.
This year, with Addison and Huff to force the issue on the edge and Lyerla to stretch the hash, De'Anthony Thomas has an opportunity to punish defenses in the soft interior. Between the hashes, as linebackers stretch wide for run fakes and try to expand to Lyerla, there will be space for DAT to operate.
Instead of a steady diet of sideline work that gives Thomas a one-way go as defenders flow inside-out to him, getting the ball in the interior truly will give the junior space. The type of two-way goes that he gets on returns, freedom to go left or right, as he blows past linebackers and makes defensive backs look silly.
Thomas is going to get his touches on the ground, the next phase of his explosion will be not just catching passes on the edge but using mismatches and positioning to get more through the air. Last year, West Virginia, with Tavon Austin, showed just how dangerous a receiver out of the backfield or the slot could be, ripping up the defense's inside. Safeties cannot get into the box quick enough and linebackers cannot play run and get to coverage zones at the same time.
Oregon, with a more experienced Mariota, appears poised on offense to surpass last season's high-powered numbers. The bread-and-butter plays of the Oregon offense are going to continue to churn up yards. If Helfrich can find space inside for Thomas, out of the slot, motion and the backfield, the offense will certainly add another way to tax defenses.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
There's bad news to report on the Georgia recruiting front. Nick Glass, 4-star safety out of Atlanta, GA, has decommitted.
Chad Simmons of Scout.com reported on the decommitment via Twitter:
Glass has offers from many major college football programs, so it's hard to pinpoint just what "everybody" entails. Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Clemson, Florida State, Notre Dame, South Carolina, Stanford and Vanderbilt have all offered Glass, and that's just a sampling of his offer list.
The 4-star recruit took to Twitter to explain a bit of his reasoning for decommitting:
While this is good news for just about "everybody" else, Glass' decommitment is a huge loss for Mark Richt and the Bulldogs.
Normally the kids who stay committed for that long are truly invested and believe in the program, so this is indeed surprising news.
There's also the fact that Glass is an in-state recruit, and especially in Georgia, landing and keeping those recruits is important. It's a state with a ton of recruiting talent, and big-time programs like Alabama and Florida have their own pipelines that Richt and his staff have to consistently worry about.
Every in-state commitment is huge for Georgia. Conversely, it's definitely a talking point for Georgia's detractors every time it loses an in-state recruit. Glass is the No. 35 player from the state, according to the 247Sports composite rankings, so he is undoubtedly a talented in-state player.
Also, take a look at this tweet from Michael Carvell of AJC.com:
That's not a good look for the Bulldogs.
Finally, this decommitment may hurt Georgia the most because Glass was one of those "ambassador recruits." He was essentially another recruiter out there, talking to players about Georgia and trying to get them into the mix for the Bulldogs. Here's what he wrote in a USA Today High School Sports blog in November of 2012:
I definitely do my fair share of recruiting, trying to get some big-time guys to join me at Georgia.
I’m going hard after two guys in my class: Raekwon McMillan and Myles Autry.
Raekwon is probably the top linebacker in the country in 2014 and Myles is a monster running back. He’s top five in the country. So hopefully I can get them to come on with me.
That's the type of commitment that Georgia has lost, and that's the type of commitment that is hard to replace.
The Bulldogs have 16 commitments and Georgia's class is ranked No. 5 nationally, per the 247Sports team rankings.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
The question is simple, but the answer is anything but. It isn’t a cut-and-dried yes or no—and it rarely ever is, despite the demand for dramatic, instantaneous transformation.
Like anything else, there’s a balance to be had when it comes to autographs and “amateur” athletes. As allegations of Johnny Manziel signings continue to mount—with concrete proof of broken rules still yet to surface—amateurism suddenly has a new bull’s eye on its back.
Prehistoric NCAA practices are being taken to task, thrown into the national spotlight that it has delicately tiptoed around. At the same time, coaches are scrambling to ensure their star players remain eligible, focusing on how these recent developments could highlight conflicts closer to home.
Teams like Miami and Louisville have joined Texas A&M in modifying autograph policies on their fan days just to play it safe. On the surface, it may seem like a small, predictable change, although these decisions speak volumes.
While Miami and Texas A&M have identified specific items that can be signed, Louisville head coach Charlie Strong announced that players would not be permitted to sign any memorabilia at the team’s fan day, according to ESPN.com:
I would like to personally apologize to our outstanding fans. However, because of the national problem of autographed items appearing for sale on eBay and other websites, we have made a proactive decision to hold an open practice for the fans and forgo an autograph session.
We have monitored the situation closely, and we decided to protect the eligibility of our players and operate under the principle that it is not permissible to accept any type of compensation for their autograph or the sale of memorabilia. I know this will disappoint a lot of our fans, especially the young children who look up to our players, but I strongly feel this is the best decision for our football program.
A signature, for most, is something that can be cherished and enjoyed, tucked away in a glass cabinet to be shared with the occasional visitor. It serves as a trophy, a reminder of the one time you and perhaps your father enjoyed a moment with someone you admire. It has no monetary value to you, regardless of your curiosity over its worth. It’s special for each individual because to him or her it’s one of a kind.
This is the fairytale version. It is real, but it is not alone.
This autograph phenomenon has an ugly underbelly, one that is coming to light as the Manziel saga plays out. For those who gave up on this sentimental trophy grab long ago, this signature can serve as a valuable means of profit—one (or many) that can be flipped quickly for financial gain. There are no good intentions for these brokers (a title that sounds entirely too official for this line of work).
Some of these “brokers”—like the one who purchased a last-minute plane ticket next to Johnny Manziel just so he could badger him at 35,000 feet—make even the shadiest of boosters seem like Mother Teresa.
Autograph seeker who purposely booked himself on a flight next to Manziel offered him $ to sign on flight, Manziel turned it down.— darren rovell (@darrenrovell) August 7, 2013
Painting the autograph-hungry world as composed of a) kids and b) those only interested in profit isn’t exactly correct. There are exceptions, of course, just like anything else, where gray area exists. College football is jam-packed with them.
And there’s a third member of this autograph pie chart, at least in the specific instance of Manziel.
As ESPN.com’s Wright Thompson outlined, Manziel’s parents have served as an unofficial broker of sorts when it comes to his signature. Not necessarily for profit or financial gain, but out of “obligation,” which is open to interpretation.
Whenever he'd see his parents, they'd always have a carload of things to autograph. They hated it, and he did too. But they seemed compelled by manners, and obligation, and one autograph didn't seem like that big a deal. But taken together, they just boxed him in more: Even his own family wanted things from him. Whom could he trust?
Thus, all signatures—at least for the time being—have been grouped under one giant umbrella.
Coaches are interested in keeping their players eligible, which is why a “ban” on these autograph sessions is becoming more widespread in the present. This Band-Aid fix is just that. Schools will learn more about this process (and more specifically, if there’s anything in store for Texas A&M).
Fans and brokers (or families) want the autograph for vastly different reasons, but securing this signature satisfies all parties. There’s a world of difference in marveling over a signed program and counting hundreds in the back room of a warehouse for goods just purchased or sold. But the satisfaction received from someone else’s work (in this case, a barely legible name in cursive) remains the same for all parties.
Except, of course, for the player.
The “student-athlete” is at the mercy of a broken system. A star player is not permitted to capitalize on his star power or even his own signature. The universities can market “Player No. 2” if and when they please—oh, and they will—while the brokers can maneuver their way into the picture, using these athletes as a profit stepping stool.
The only difference between the broker and the NCAA is the NCAA does its work right in front of you, hiding openly behind a system that allows it to exploit. The brokers would much rather stay in the dark corner, doing their duties in airplanes and counting their cash behind closed doors.
Limiting autograph opportunities in select scenarios doesn’t begin to solve the greater problem at hand. It’s a short-term deflection, and an easy one, which is why it may become more prevalent. Further tightening these restrictions, however, will only move further away from what's fair.
The question isn’t whether college football players should be able to sign autographs—because of course they should. The larger, potential game-changing query is whether they should be fairly compensated for their efforts.
And that’s a billion-dollar question awaiting a fair reply.
That’s not to say that the floodgates should be thrown open and that the free market should decide which 19-year-old student-athletes should become instant millionaires. This is a delicate issue that requires a delicate, balanced response.
Whether someone’s finally willing to admit it’s a conversation worth having is another story.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
The Auburn defense has run into another hiccup on the path to improve. Defensive end Dee Ford has suffered a knee injury, and the timetable for a return remains unknown, according to Joel A. Erickson of AL.com.
The good news for Auburn is that head coach Gus Malzahn doesn't believe the injury is serious and expects the senior to bounce back quickly.
"He didn’t practice today, [Thursday]" Malzahn said. "But we feel like it shouldn’t be too long to get him back on the field."
Malzahn also refused to comment on the severity of the injury.
"I’m not getting into specifics of anybody’s injury," Malzahn said.
An injury to a quality defensive player is the last thing Auburn needs heading into the season. The Tigers defense ranked 13th in the SEC last year, allowing 420 yards a game. The lousy defensive performances played a key role in why the team finished with a 3-9 record.
The defensive line already lost Corey Lemonier to the NFL draft, and Ford is expected to be the top pass-rusher on the team. He led the team last season with six sacks and finished second with eight quarterback hurries.
Auburn begins the season at home Aug. 31 against Washington State, an up-tempo team that will look to score quickly and wear down the Auburn defense.
It was going to be a tough matchup for the young defense, that will be even younger if Ford is unable to play. Now, freshmen defenders Carl Lawson and Elijah Daniel are expected to see more reps in fall camp with Ford sidelined.
Defensive coordinator Ellis Johnson likes what he sees from the young guys, per the Erickson report.
The two ends, Elijah and Carl, continue to show that they're capable of mixing it up on this level, Johnson said. I think they're coming along well enough that we're going to be able to play those guys sometimes and hopefully early.
Auburn may need both players to play immediately depending on how fast Ford can recover.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
The California Golden Bears landed a big-time recruit, as 4-star athlete and linebacker Devante Downs announced his verbal commitment to head coach Sonny Dykes.
Justin Hopkins of 247Sports provides the news:
The Cal commit list just got even better today. Mountlake Terrace (Wash.) athlete Devante Downs added his four-star talents to the list and committed to the Bears...
... 'I really liked it when I was down there,' [Devante] Downs said. 'My mom went to and she liked it as well. I like the coaches and how they use their system.'
... Downs will be brought in as an athlete including a shot at running back.
Downs played his high school ball at Mountlake Terrace High School in Washington state, and took snaps as a running back, a linebacker and a safety for the Hawks during his junior season. He also had offers from Stanford, Washington, Arizona, Arizona State, Oregon State, Utah and Boise State.
According to 247Sports' rankings, Downs ranks much higher as an overall prospect than his composite score. He's listed as the No. 84 player in the country, No. 6 outside linebacker and No. 2 player in the state of Washington for the 2014 class in the initial rankings, while the composite marks rank him No. 229, No. 18 and No. 2, respectively.
Listed as an athlete on his highlight tape, Downs has shown an ability to contribute on both sides of the ball.
A 6'3", 230-pound bruiser, Downs has been a matchup nightmare for high school defenses when he's in the backfield. He is currently too fast for defensive lineman, too shifty for linebackers and too strong for defensive backs. He has a nice burst out of the backfield, and has ideal size to be a power back at the next level.
He also shows extreme potential on defense, where his wide frame and speed off the edge would be vital to the Pac-12 offenses he will see on a weekly basis. While it's clear that Downs is a talented back, his long-term future (thinking NFL) will likely benefit more from making the full-time switch to defense.
If you're itching to check out Cal's newest recruit, you can pencil in the U.S. Army All American Bowl as a prime opportunity to check out his skills (via MTHSports on Twitter):
Downs might not have a set position when he comes to campus next fall, but his skills on both sides of the ball will be a huge coup for Dykes. While he'll get a shot at running back, fans should assume he'll be used as a linebacker.
Verbal commitments are non-binding, and the first day a 2014 recruit can sign his National Letter of Intent (NLI) is Feb. 5, 2014 (h/t NCAA.org).
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
The Notre Dame Fighting Irish are coming off an extremely successful campaign overall, finishing the previous regular season undefeated before unfortunately losing to powerhouse Alabama in the BCS national title game.
Several prominent contributors from last year are no longer with the team, and due to the 42-14 thrashing at the hands of the Crimson Tide, Brian Kelly's bunch opens the 2013 preseason polls as the No. 11-ranked team in the country.
Quarterback Everett Golson won't be leading the offense due to a fall semester suspension, which puts senior Tommy Rees in the saddle to keep the positive momentum going. That will be difficult without tight end Tyler Eifert, who was drafted by the Cincinnati Bengals in the first round.
Reigning Maxwell Award winner Manti Te'o also won't be anchoring the defense at linebacker, so others will have to step up to fill the void.
A rather difficult schedule presents plenty of opportunities for the Irish to prove themselves, though. Below is a breakdown of the biggest games of 2013 for the Irish and their prospects of winning each one.
Game 2, Sept. 7: at Michigan
The Te'o-less defense will be tested early against the likes of the Wolverines, who sport a possible Heisman Trophy contender at quarterback in Devin Gardner.
With prototypical arm strength, a strong frame and fantastic speed that allowed him to play wide receiver in 2012, Gardner presents plenty of problems for the Irish as a dual-threat quarterback. In Brady Hoke's pro-style system, he will test the Notre Dame secondary by throwing deep down the field.
Although Michigan lost star safety Jordan Kovacs to graduation, it still had one of the premier pass defenses, which will require George Atkinson III and Co. to pick up the slack in the Notre Dame running game.
If Rees is put in a position where he has to throw the ball a lot to lead the Irish on a comeback charge, it could be bad news and a disappointing early loss.
Thankfully, Rees flashed clutch ability in relief of Golson last season, but with the weight of expectations and a lack of proven playmakers outside of DaVaris Daniels and experienced yet modestly productive TJ Jones, pulling this one out in Ann Arbor could be very difficult.
This is a sort of a rivalry game, and Michigan will be seeking revenge for last year's gritty 13-6 loss. Expect this to be a higher-scoring affair, with Notre Dame needing a strong running game to keep Gardner off the field as much as possible to seal a victory on the road.
Game 7, Oct. 19: vs. USC
Speaking of rivalries, the Trojans are one of the Irish's arch-nemeses. Each year, the schedule alternates between Notre Dame taking on Stanford and USC in the season finale, and this time around the Irish will do battle with Lane Kiffin's team after the bye week.
There are other important contests following the Michigan game—which is important to establish early-season momentum. However, setting the tone following the bye week might be mot important.
Being well-rested should bode well for Notre Dame's chances, and defensive coordinator Bob Diaco can dial up the pressure against whomever the Trojans have under center.
A quarterback competition is taking place between Max Wittek and Cody Kessler.
Wittek was unimpressive against Notre Dame at home last season, throwing two costly interceptions in a 23-14 loss after guaranteeing a victory. The Irish won't forget that, regardless if he's on the sidelines or under center.
Kessler is athletic and an intriguing talent as a precocious sophomore, but he's only thrown two passes in his short career.
However, containing superstar playmaker Marqise Lee will be easier said than done. If the Irish can keep him under wraps, the Trojans probably won't be able to muster much firepower.
The defense is also a huge question mark for Southern California, which is transitioning to a new scheme after struggling in Monte Kiffin's 4-3, Tampa 2 alignment a season ago.
Game 12, Nov. 30: at Stanford
The physical brand of football that the Cardinal play must be matched by the Irish in the trenches, and it will be critical for nose tackle Louis Nix and defensive end Stephon Tuitt to stymie the Stanford running game.
Running back Stepfan Taylor is no longer in the fold, but senior Tyler Gaffney returns from professional baseball after averaging 6.1 yards per carry and scoring seven touchdowns in 2011.
Kevin Hogan is a dangerous runner at quarterback for the Cardinal, too, and also completed 71.4 percent of his passes in his limited action a season ago.
Despite a small sample size, Hogan has the promise to be a breakout star this season.
After supplanting Josh Nunes as starter in the middle of 2012, Hogan guided Stanford to impressive victories at Oregon and in the Rose Bowl over Wisconsin. He went 4-0 as a starter and replaced Nunes early in a 48-0 rout of Colorado.
The good news for Notre Dame? Stanford's own star tight end, Zach Ertz, also moved on to the pros, and four of the team's top five receivers are no longer on the team.
Rees came off the bench for Golson, completed all four of his passes for 43 yards and the game-winning touchdown to Jones to boost the Irish to a 20-13 win in overtime last year.
Hogan's lack of weaponry and Diaco's exotic 3-4 schemes may be enough to prevent the Cardinal from getting redemption, even at home in a low-scoring, hard-hitting showdown.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
Jim Mora and the UCLA Bruins are wrapping up the two-week fall camp period in San Bernardino. Due to injury concerns, younger players are going to be thrust into significant roles.
As is the case with the majority of teams nationally, fall practice has been a mixed bag of sorts.
Here's a progress report of the second week of fall practice for the UCLA football team.
Boise State is closing out another week of fall practice, and so far, things look to be progressing well.
There have only been a few minor issues and a couple of injuries to report. Head coach Chris Petersen and his staff are most likely happy with the camp, overall.
The one issue that might have coach Petersen and his crew a bit nervous is depth—especially on the defensive line.
Of course, that is the same thing that was said at this time last year.
Let's take a look at the Week 2 fall practice stock report and discover which players are raising their game and which players need to step it up.
The college football season is just weeks away, and we can't wait to watch ESPN's College GameDay to help us get riled up for another Saturday full of glorious games. Chris Fowler, Kirk Herbstreit, Desmond Howard, Lee Corso and his famous headgear are ready to travel to the hottest games each week of the upcoming season.
But what if all college football outside of the SEC simply ceased to exist?
Of course, SEC fans already think they're the only ones who know college football, and it's getting harder to argue with them since they've won the last seven national championships.
So, what if College GameDay ignored every game that didn't have at least one SEC team in the mix?
“We bow to no man, we bow to no program. We are going to build a bully.” — Jim Harbaugh
In the winter of 2006, on the heels of their fifth straight losing season and an embarrassing 1-11 record, belief that the Stanford Cardinal could put a competitive team on the field was wavering. There were even rumblings that Stanford should drop down a division, presumably to compete against its brainy Ivy League brethren, or drop football altogether.
Cue the fiery Harbaugh and his young staff. They recognized that while Stanford could not lower their academic standards to broaden their talent pool, they could take advantage of THE Stanford student-athlete’s unique psychology and ‘inherent competitiveness’ to build a winner.
Before that process could start on the football field in spring practice, it would be introduced by the Kissick Family Director of Football Sports Performance, Shannon Turley, in summer conditioning. He was, and still is, responsible for planting the seeds of belief in the Cardinal freshmen and getting the upperclassmen to buy into the philosophy the Harbaugh regime was selling and David Shaw continues to sell.
“When you are losing and you are 1-11, there are people that are frustrated,” said Turley. “They know that there are things that are unacceptable being accepted and they want a change.’’
To begin, Turley said the Stanford Player Development team enlisted the aid or upperclassmen who were “borderline obsessed” with change. “Then we empowered them so they could impose their own expectations on the roster, which is so much more effective than any coach talking.”Year Rushing Yards Attempts YPC National Ranking 2006 781 367 2.1 115th 2007 1334 446 3.0 103rd 2008 2395 490 4.9 31st 2009 2837 536 5.3 10th 2010 2779 535 5.2 18th 2011 2738 518 5.3 20th 2012 2440 549 4.4 39th
If there were a way to statistically quantify a team’s bully factor, it would be rushing yards and rushing yards allowed. These stats are heavily dependent on a team’s ability to control the trenches and impose its will on the opposing offense or defense. Classic bully characteristics.Year Rushing Yards Allowed Attempts YPC National Ranking 2006 2526 519 4.9 118th 2007 2032 480 4.2 73rd 2008 1835 475 4.0 76th 2009 1734 386 4.5 62nd 2010 1515 372 4.1 23rd 2011 1084 349 3.1 4th 2012 1140 400 2.8 4th
In the six years since Turley brought his strength and conditioning program to the farm, the defense has cut the number yards allowed per carry in half, and the offense has more than tripled its production on the ground.
A bully was born. Here’s how they did it.
"I DON’T CARE HOW MUCH YOU CAN BENCH"
There aren’t a lot of bells and whistles on the farm; the Stanford program focuses on simplicity and execution. “I don’t have a lot of secrets or gimmicks,” said Turley. “There is an old school way that probably works. It’s been working for a long time.”
Turley does not have some sort of magical formula, nor are his players putting up Zeus-like numbers in the weight room.
“I don’t care how much guys can bench squat or power clean. It has nothing to do with playing football. Football is blocking and tackling. It’s creating contact, avoiding contact and gaining separation if you are a skill guy on the perimeter. That’s football."
What they are doing is building one of the most comprehensive and successful player development programs in the country through highly specialized training, personalized by position and player.
Stanford’s player development team focuses their efforts on injury prevention, athletic performance and mental discipline—in that order. Basically, the Stanford weight program doesn’t worry about having the ‘‘strongest’’ guys in college football. It focuses on football strength, technique and making sure the best Cardinal players stay on the field all season.
“This is an unusual and forward-thinking focus,” said Will Carroll, the Sports Medicine Lead Writer at Bleacher Report. “I guess we should expect that from Stanford. Most teams use the weight room and even advanced tools like Alter-G treadmills, SwimEx pools and the like in a caveman fashion. It’s all: get bigger, get faster—which is easily measured. Injury prevention is more subtle.”
The guiding principle is “do no harm,” and Stanford has been wildly successful in doing so. In the six years since Turley took over the Stanford strength program, games missed due to injury has decreased 87 percent.
“That kind of drop is stunning,” Carroll explained. “I think most programs would be happy with 10 percent. For an NFL team, that kind of drop would be worth a win or more, as well as about 20 million in lost payroll.”
For those who say numbers in the weight room are important measure of success on the field, Turley would counter with the example of Stanford’s 6’5”, 313-pound All-American guard David Yankey, who Turley says can barely bench his own body weight.
‘‘He’s got to have some pop, I get it,” said Turley. “But isn’t the rate at which you strike more important than moving a bunch of weight around really slow?”
Turely explains that bench press and squat goals don’t even factor into his thinking when he designs a workout for a player. He is concerned only with a player’s ability to move as he needs to on the football field.
For an offensive lineman like Yankey, this means the mobility and stability of his shoulder, the stability of his core and the mobility of his lower body. Optimizing those characteristics allows him to get low and quickly apply force in the direction he intends to move, thus fulfilling his role as a blocker.
Stanford’s focus on injury prevention over athletic performance, along with the absence of the almighty record board in the weight room, sets its program apart from other powerhouse programs (yes, Stanford is a modern-day powerhouse).
“This functional focus, with less emphasis on big muscles and gallons of sweat, is brilliant,” Carroll said. “Each player has a function and certain movements and patterns that help him fulfill that function. Stanford is way ahead of the curve on this.”
“Our numbers are very unimpressive,” said Turley. “But we’re not chasing numbers. We are chasing lean muscle, reducing body fat and making guys functionally strong for football.”
CAN’T STOP, WON’T STOP
Stanford football is a year-long commitment. Between the season, spring practice, fall camp and three six-to-seven week offseason training sessions, the Cardinal players are participating in football-related activities for 43 week out of the year. Of those weeks, 19 are spent exclusively in the weight room and on the track under Turley’s supervision.
The winter program is focused on recovery from the season, while the spring offseason program is the only time the Cardinal focuses on speed and power development.
Things heat up in the summer when conditioning is the main focus. From late June through the first week of August, Turley will run his players through a variety of position-specific exercises that focus on the movements they are going to execute repeatedly in fall practice and throughout the season.
During the season, the Stanford program focuses on recovery and restoring mobility to sore bodies that have performed the same action over and over again on the field.
The stated goal of Turley’s strength program is to “develop lean, athletic players that can play with low pads and leverage and exert force in the direction that they intend to move.” Turley is building football players, not weightlifters or track athletes. “We are not training for a 40 because you don’t run a 40 in football,” he said.
All of Stanford’s workouts are grounded in the SAID (Specific Adaptations to Imposed Demands) principle which he has carried with him since his days as a student assistant working under Mike Gentry at Virginia Tech.
Turley “fundamentally and firmly” believes that the best way to train for football is to practice and repeat the specific movements a player is required to make on the field and designs personalized workouts for each player accordingly.
Turley and his staff start with separate workout templates designed for each of the six player groups (skill, big skill, linemen, quarterbacks, specialists, freshmen) and personalize based on a player’s injury history and predetermined movement patterns, which usually stem from experience playing other sports or previous injury. As the players’ bodies mature throughout their careers, the workouts change.
“I think the more specialized you can be, the more things you can influence in the physical and mental development of your players,” said Turley.
All-American tight end Coby Fleener is a great example of a player who came in with a pre-existing injury—a herniated disc—which Turley was able to work around.
During Fleener’s five years at Stanford, Turley said he modified the tight end’s workout based on his injury and his individual needs. “It was a lot different when he was a 219-pound freshman and a 250-pound senior,” he said.
Don’t be mistaken, Turley does not take it easy on a player because he has a pre-existing weakness from an injury, poor training or overuse on the field. His challenge is to find a way to offset that weakness to allow the player to reach optimal performance on the field.
For example, Stanford senior right tackle Cameron Fleming’s right hip is “locked up” due to overuse. This is a “very predictable” situation for a right tackle, according to Turley.
Fleming plants and drives off of his right leg on virtually every rep he takes in practice or a game. At Stanford’s average of 69.1 offensive plays per game, that’s 967 plays per year, in addition to countless practice reps. That’s a lot of wear and tear.
“We are going to train him as a right tackle because that’s what he is and that’s what he’s got to be good at,” Turley said. “But with that comes a certain overdeveloped musculature and firing pattern [in his hip and leg]. I can’t take it easy on him, per se, but we’ve got to do more mobility work to address his risk.”
The most unique aspect of the Stanford strength program is its focus on isometric and eccentric exercises. While other college football programs and weekend warrior weightlifters focus on the force delivering or concentric aspect of a lift or exercise (rising out of a squat or pushing up the bench press bar), Turley is preaching the control of the weight. This increases stability and durability of the muscle.
Concentric-focused training is power focused and creates great numbers in the gym, but puts athletes in a greater danger of injury.
“While some programs do similar things, it’s seldom the focus,” explained Carroll. “It’s secondary or worse. Anyone who’s been in a weight room has done ‘negative reps’ or ‘slo-mo reps,' but this kind of program built around those things is unique.”
Turley starts all the players—upperclassmen and freshmen alike—with body weight movements or accentuated eccentrics (the lowering phase of a pull-up) and isometrics (holding a push-up or squat in position for an extended period of time). These exercises teach players how to control their bodies and learn how to have the endurance to do it correctly when they get fatigued.
SHOCK TO THE SYSTEM
In their first summer in the program, freshmen work pretty much exclusively on conditioning, flexibility and core strength through the use of accentuated eccentrics and isometrics. They do your gym teacher’s favorite exercises: pull-ups, push-ups, body weight squats and lunges. They even climb rope “like old school gym class,” said Turley.
The bright-eyed rookies face a big shock when they first first show up at the weight room. They don’t get to touch the weights, at least for the first three weeks. “They want to go lift weights, but I’m not gonna let ‘em,” said Turley.
“It’s pretty frustrating. But it’s part of the mental discipline. You find out who can concentrate, who can take coaching, block out the noise and keep grinding through it and find a way to meet the standard and get it done. Somebody is going to break, it’s inevitable.”
An 18-year-old’s first few weeks on a college campus are tough enough without the pressure that comes with playing football at a Division I school, so Turley is careful to ease his new players into the program. These guys are used to being big fish in small ponds. But when the arrive on the farm, the pond expands and the fish get bigger and stronger.
“The initial shock is the productivity and the amount of work we are going to compress into a run,” said Turley. "That volume and intensity of the conditioning is overwhelming. We get done with the first 15 minutes of warm-ups some days and these kids are already spent. The stress of having to compete when they’re already fatigued is almost emotionally traumatic."
ALIGN YOUR CHOICES WITH YOUR GOALS
Turley’s mental development program kicks into high gear immediately when a new group of freshmen arrive on campus. “The shock factor is an opportunity for you to impact their first learning,” Turley said.
He firmly believes that what Stanford football players “learn first, they are going to learn best,” which makes a player’s buy-in during those trying first three weeks all the more important to their eventual success in the Stanford program.
The first summer is all about getting the newbies “to invest in the process and develop the right habits” in football, training, diet and lifestyle. For Stanford players, investment in the process means consistently making choices that align with a player’s goals for himself and the team. Turley calls this buy-in “fundamentally important.”
Turley uses accountability and personal challenges as the major tools of mental development. He describes his program as “process focused,” which means he sets effort and improvement goals for his players rather than chasing result-oriented goals. “I don’t care [about] the number, I care about their ability to improve it.”
The team code of conduct is simple: technique, effort, attitude and mental discipline. “Four things you have complete and total control over, that take absolutely no talent and no ability. That’s where we want to invest ourselves. In every situation they are in with us, they have complete and total control over that.”
Ownership is of paramount importance to the psychology of Stanford teams. Every summer the seniors draw up a team covenant with Turley. The seniors use the covenant to set the goals for the season and an action plan for how to achieve them. They take ownership of the covenant and self-police the underclassmen.
“Now they can impose their own expectations on the roster, which is so much more effective than any coach talking,” said Turley.
As you can imagine, the 2007 version looks a lot different than the 2012 version. The 2007 version is cluttered, unfocused and reflects a losing culture. The mission and goals are very outcome-focused, and there are a ton of rules that might fall under the common sense umbrella. At the bottom are a few statements basically begging players to buy in.
“That’s a pretty awful team covenant,” said Turley. “It was great for what we needed at the time, but that shows you where the culture was.”
The 2012 team covenant only lists one goal: Win the Pac-12 championship.
All quotes obtained first hand unless otherwise noted. Follow Max Rausch on Twitter @MaxHRausch.
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
The road to fall rolls on for the Ohio State Buckeyes as they are about two weeks away from the start of the 2013 season.
Fall camp is in its second week as the depth chart starts to shake out ever so slowly. Different names continue to emerge as others suffer difficult setbacks.
It's all part of the nature of college football and something every program goes through, no matter how big or small.
Two weeks into fall camp, here is the latest stock report for the Buckeyes.
With a 12-1 record, the Fighting Irish had a magical run last season until they were blown out by Alabama in the BCS National Championship game, 42-14. Even though Notre Dame failed to win its first BCS bowl game in school history, the program is back where it needs to be.
But will head coach Brian Kelly be able to work the same magic again this year?
Starting quarterback Everett Golson is gone for at least a season after being suspended for academic reasons, and it’s almost a blessing that All-American linebacker Manti Te’o is in the NFL now, after the whole fake girlfriend scandal. There is still a lot of talent on the defense, but the offense could be questionable.
Will a second consecutive BCS bowl game be reachable? Let's take a look at the offense, defense/special teams and schedule.
With Golson out, the Irish will go back to quarterback Tommy Rees, who closed games out last season against Purdue, Michigan and Stanford. He also started one game against BYU when Golson was out with a concussion. It’s not a matter of talent for Rees; it’s more about him staying focused and taking care of the football.
The running game will hurt without Theo Riddick, who rushed for 917 yards and five touchdowns last season, as well as Cierre Wood. The backfield will now rely on junior George Atkinson III, sophomore USC transfer Amir Carlisle and freshman Greg Bryant.
The receiving corps will be without one of its best weapons from last season in tight end Tyler Eifert. The Irish do return many of their targets, though. Four-year starter T.J. Jones, who had 649 receiving yards and four touchdowns last season, will lead a receiving corps that consists of junior DaVaris Daniels and junior tight end Troy Niklas.
If the Irish want to get better offensively, the passing game has to be better than it was last season, especially with the loss of Eifert and two strong backs in the running game.
The offensive line will be the best part of the Notre Dame offense this season with left tackle Zack Martin returning for his final year. The line also includes left guard Chris Watt and right tackle Christian Lombard, but they will need replacements at center and right guard.
Defense and Special Teams
The Notre Dame defense was one of the best in the country last season. The Irish gave up just 12.8 points per game and held opponents to 305.5 yards per game. With eight returning players back from last season, the defense should be just as talented, if not better.
There are questions on the offensive side going into the season, meaning the defense may have a lot of the weight put on its shoulders again this season.
The defensive line will be the greatest aspect of the Irish defense. Senior nose guard Louis Nix III and junior defensive end Stephon Tuitt are two of the best players in the nation at their positions. Nix had 50 tackles last season, while Tuitt recorded 12 sacks.
The linebacking corps will be without Te’o, but look for junior Jarrett Grace to make a big impact with his speed and run-stopping ability. Grace will be surrounded by returning starters Dan Fox, Prince Shembo and Danny Spond.
The secondary will basically stay intact and have depth this season. Cornerback Bennett Jackson returns after recording 65 tackles and four interceptions last season. The secondary also consists of cornerback KeiVarae Russell and free safety Matthias Farley.
Like last season, Notre Dame will have another challenging schedule. The game at Michigan in Week 2 will be the usual nail-biter. The following three weeks will consist of two home games against Michigan State and Oklahoma, as well as a game in Arlington, Texas against Arizona State. A bye week before a home game against bitter rival USC on Oct. 19 will be much needed.
The end of the schedule cools down a bit, but the Irish will still be tested and their BCS bowl fate could be determined when they play at Stanford on Nov. 30.
Projection: 9-3Date Opponent Outcome 8/31 Temple W 9/7 @Michigan L 9/14 @Purdue W 9/21 Michigan State W 9/28 Oklahoma W 10/5 Arizona State W 10/19 USC L 10/26 @Air Force W 11/2 Navy W 11/9 @Pittsburgh W 11/23 BYU W 11/30 @Stanford L
Read more College Football news on BleacherReport.com
Behind every win, every loss, each championship and every failure, there is a head coach.
The man who guides players, leads the team and influences every aspect of the program.
The men on this list are all head coaches and they have been for a long time.
They are the 10 longest tenured FBS head coaches who are still currently at the helm of their programs heading into the 2013 season. They have been leading the same program in consecutive seasons for longer than anyone else currently in the game.
There is something to be said for stability and loyalty, and these head coaches have stuck around, through good times and bad, for their respective programs.
Nebraska football fans have been paying close attention to fall practice reports, trying to garner whatever information they can on how NU is faring and who will be starring for the scarlet and cream this season.
So let’s take a look at what we know now about practice and see whose stock is moving up and whose is moving down.
Two weeks of fall practice are now in the books, and the Hokies are just 15 days away from a showdown with No. 1 Alabama in Atlanta.
Can the Hokies pull off the upset?
If the first two weeks of fall practice are any indication, the Hokies may be in trouble. Several players expected to either start or contribute have been sidelined with injuries.
Senior quarterback Logan Thomas is using these practice sessions as a way to get familiar with a host of new receiving weapons. Fortunately for Thomas, he is going up against one of the better defensive units in the country each day in practice.
While it has been a tough week overall for the Hokies, here are some of the more newsworthy items involving the team over the past seven days.